“Requiem for the CRT” (SCMS 2011 presentation)

At SCMS 2011, I participated in a panel titled “Digital Television, Analog Memories” along with Karen Lury and Amy Holdsworth, both of the University of Glasgow. The panel explored themes of memory, materiality, and everydayness in relation to the digitalization of television. Amy kicked off the panel with a presentation titled “Nostalgic Frames: Televising and Teaching Television History and Memory.” Drawing on research for her forthcoming Palgrave book Television, Memory, and Nostalgia, Amy raised a number of provocative questions about the political economy of nostalgia programming (e.g. BBC4’s TV on Trial and Channel 5′s Greatest TV Comedy Moments) before concluding with some observations about the pedagogical challenges television’s current “memory boom” presents. Karen closed the session with her paper “‘Close’ Viewing: Stories of Technology in the Move from Analog to Digital Media,” a refreshingly original presentation that many attendees (including this one) agreed was one of the most exciting of the entire conference. Karen went door to door in her Glasgow close (the Scottish term for tenement-style apartments) photographing her neighbors’ media set-ups and interviewing them about their families’ media habits. The result was an engrossing story that was as much about neighborliness as it was about technology. Lury’s tour through her neighbors’ flats invited the audience to recall the ethnographic studies that had defined television studies during its formative years, and to consider how these familiar research methods might complement or complicate more recent industry-focused scholarship on digitalization and convergence.

In between these stellar papers I presented some new work on the changing cultural meanings of the cathode ray tube (CRT) television. The paper follows below, a .pdf version is available here. This is still a work in progress, and I would very much appreciate any feedback anyone felt like offering. And since this is an unfinished work, I ask that you please contact me directly before citing it.

Read more of this post

“Level Who?” Digital Distribution’s Mysterious Middlemen

The following is a short piece I wrote up about Net Worth: Media Distribution in the Digital Era, a one-day conference sponsored by the Carsey-Wolf Center at the University of California, Santa Barbara. The event brought together media industry workers and scholars from a variety of disciplines for a series of 90-minute panels on the challenges and opportunities posed by digital distribution. Having attended a number of less than successful industry/academia conferences in the past, I was really impressed by the quality of the discussions that took place at Net Worth. I credit that to the organizers (UCSB’s Joshua Green, Jen Holt, and Michael Curtin), who did a fantastic job of composing the panel topics and lineups.

At Net Worth I participated on a panel titled Technologies of Digital Distribution. I was joined on the stage of the Pollack Theater that day by moderator Anna Everett (UCSB) and panelists Horst Stipp (The Advertising Research Foundation), Kelly Summers (Walt Disney Studios), Randy Shaffer (Microsoft Corp.), Joseph Turow (University of Pennsylvania), and Phillip Napoli (Fordham University). Our panel was very lively, and gave me a lot to think about. This piece represents a preliminary attempt to organize some of those thoughts.
Read more of this post

Conferencing, mentoring and professionalization: reflections on SCMS 2011

Ever since the 2011 Society for Cinema and Media Studies conference wrapped up on Sunday, attendees have been sharing their impressions of the conference via Twitter, personal blogs, and SCMS’s recently-relaunched website. Undoubtedly the most provocative of these reports have been the ones written by first-time SCMS attendees, including graduate students Mabel Rosenheck, Noel Kirkpatrick, Myles McNutt, and Justin Horton. Though Mabel, Noel, Myles, and Justin all have their own unique perspectives on the conference (and on conferencing more generally), I think it’s fair to say that their fresh eyes have picked up on aspects of SCMS that are perhaps a little less noticeable to me and other returning attendees.
Read more of this post

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,833 other followers

%d bloggers like this: